Peer review policy

All manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer review process, and only those that meet strict standards of quality and relevance will be published.

The journal relies on the collaboration of internal and external reviewers, both domestic and international, who are independent of the editorial team and the publishing institution.

Reviewers possess expertise in research areas that align with the topic addressed in each manuscript. This includes theoretical and methodological review relevant to the research field.

The final review will result in a final decision, which may be

Accepted without revisions. The manuscript begins the publication process.
Accepted with minor revisions. The author is informed that their manuscript requires revisions, as outlined in the editorial workflow. This new version of the manuscript will be sent back to the reviewer to determine the suitability of the revised version.
Acceptable with substantial revisions. The author is informed that their manuscript requires significant revisions on their part, and a new submission deadline will be set. This new version of the manuscript will be sent back to the reviewer to assess its suitability and determine the issue in which it will be published.
Rejected. The reasons why the manuscript cannot be published are clearly stated.

In the event that the peer reviewers’ decisions are conflicting, a third reviewer’s opinion will be sought to resolve the dispute.

The peer reviewers’ decision is final and cannot be appealed.